Home » Uncategorized » The dangerous Iranian dilemma

The dangerous Iranian dilemma

President Biden vowed to respond after a drone strike by rebels I n Syria linked to Iran killed three U.S. service members and wounded at least 34 others. The drone hit American troops stationed in northeast Jordan near the Syrian border early Sunday. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, a coalition of militias backed by Iran, claimed credit for the attack. “We had a tough day last night in the Middle East. We lost three brave souls,” Biden said during a stop at Brookland Baptist church in West Columbia, S.C. After leading a moment of silence, Biden said: “And we shall respond.”

The Iranians’ proxies—Houthis, Hezbollah, Islamic Resistance, and Hamas, to name most—are each and all attacking western and Israeli targets in multiple regions of the Middle East. The critical question is why? The obvious answer is to force the Israelis to cease their attacks in Gaza.  One more piece of the overall intimidation strategy against everyone who supports Israel whether they be countries, political groups or commercial interests.  A well-orchestrated multi-faceted political strategy to cause pressure to be brought to bear against supporters of Israel and thus Israel itself.

The obvious answer has resulted in air attacks against the Houthis for attacking shipping in the Red Sea.  The multi-faceted political attacks have caused pressure from the Biden administration on Israel for cease fire periods, a two-state solution, etc.  However, this is not the ultimate Iranian goal.  The Iranians have a Middle East domination goal.  To accomplish that their proxies need to eliminate their close in adversaries.  The Iranians also need justification for the acquisition of nuclear weapons as an instrument in their domination.  Perceiving the West (and especially the US) as weak, timid and bogged down in Ukraine they perceived this as the perfect time to launch this region wide assault.   Should the US respond directly against Iran it must do so dramatically and devastatingly!  Iran must be shown as a paper tiger and suffer a huge setback to its nuclear ambitions if the domination objective is to be denied.  Success in such a limited but dramatic coordinated attack is probably not considered viable or politically beneficial by the non-strategists in Washington who have gotten the country into this dangerous dilemma.

One can be sure that the pseudo strategists are putting in extra hours trying to come up with a response that shows some degree of strength while not causing the Iranians to directly react vehemently—especially against the Gulf Cooperation Council states who produce a significant amount of the world’s petroleum.

The response that President Biden promised is going to be a dramatic event.  It will either be so weak as to signal that politically a response was necessary but that the US is afraid of Iran and its proxies. Or it could be sufficient to justify the Iranians escalation or de-escalation.  One must wait.


2 Comments

  1. Larry Leskovjan's avatar Larry Leskovjan says:

    I say blow the hell out of Iran’s nuclear installations. Time to make it clear to them–no more effing around. Also, we seem to do sanctions in a piecemeal fashion. Oh, that didn’t deter them–let’s ramp it up a notch. I say hit them with everything they deserve.

    Like

  2. steveputnam1943's avatar steveputnam1943 says:

    A good piece. And it is a true dilemma. I don’t think Biden or anyone in his administration has the balls for a dramatic response such as an attack on their nuclear development facilities and so whatever we do will be ineffective in stopping their thrust. If we had a Regan in White House would perhaps have a chance at that type of response. Best

    Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows J. Stephen Putnam Winter address 1445 Manatee Cir Tarpon Springs, Fl 34689 Tel 727-580-0979 Summer address Unit 7B 207 East Grand Ave Old Orchard Beach Maine 04064 Tel 727-580-0979

    Like

Leave a reply to Larry Leskovjan Cancel reply