Biden’s globalist foreign policy
Biden announced this intention in remarks on diplomacy to State Department employees last Thursday afternoon. He made the following points:
- “We must meet the new moment — accelerating global challenges — from the pandemic to the climate crisis to nuclear proliferation — challenging the will only to be solved by nations working together and in common.” “We can’t do it alone.”
- He continued: “That must be this — we must start with diplomacy rooted in America’s most cherished democratic values: defending freedom, championing opportunity, upholding universal rights, respecting the rule of law, and treating every person with dignity. That’s the grounding wire of our global policy — our global power. That’s our inexhaustible source of strength. That’s America’s abiding advantage.”
- In another part of his speech, he spoke about “rebuilding” America’s relationship with “many of our closest allies,” including Canada, Mexico, the UK, Germany, France, NATO, Japan, South Korea and Australia.
- The president claimed that Trump hurt these alliances with policies of “neglect” and “abuse.”
- He also spoke about the approach his administration will take with some of America’s enemies, including Russia and China. “I made it clear to President Putin in a manner very different from my predecessor that the days of the United States rolling over in the face of Russia’s aggressive actions interfering with our elections, cyberattacks, poisoning its citizens are over,” he said.
- However, he took a more vague, non-confrontational approach toward China, simply saying, “We’ll confront China’s economic abuses, counter its aggressive coercive action to push back on China’s attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.”
The words sound lofty and reasonable, but when you look behind them, they take a completely different meaning. The globalism focus means involvement in issues in other countries that we might better stay out of. The implication is that the US will support democracies around the world, but to many countries that are struggling with governance that support is seen as being the target of US muscle—the US will impose democracy–its form of democracy. The US is going to do what about Russia poisoning its citizens—launch nucs?
The world is a more complex place than it was when Obama tried a globalist approach 12 years ago.
- China has emerged as a global threat if not militarily, economically. It is flexing its muscles in the South China Sea and the straits of Taiwan.
- Russia wants to be super power again and is building/rebuilding its nuclear arsenal and meddling in places it shouldn’t.
- US superiority is no longer appreciated in places that don’t want the US meddling in their affairs.
- Climate change concerns are truly only a US issue, but it will be used by the US to cause structural changes both domestically and internationally.
The push to democratize the world and pursue climate change will have an adverse impact on the status of non-violent change. A quote from the Pakistani Tribune reflects many international views.
“The kind of democracy the US likes to install around the world is a code word for furthering US interests. Respecting alliances in the real world means a smooth path for the sale of war machinery and a combined pressure on whichever nation decides to look out for its own interests. Amid all this rhetoric, there is something getting ritualistically confused. They are getting things backwards. The self-congratulatory rhetoric goes that democracy would now grow around the world with an interventionist America under Biden.”
Note the concern with intervention. Many analysts equate globalism with intervention and armed conflict. The use of military force to enforce climate or governmental change becomes prevalent. This trend occurs just as the commander of the US Strategic Command, Vice Admiral Richard has warned that: “There is a real possibility that a regional crisis with either China or Russia could escalate quickly to a conflict involving nuclear weapons, if they perceived a conventional loss would threaten the regime or state.” He went on to argue that the US must prepare to meet such an eventuality.
If one ties Biden’s globalism with the STRATCOM commander’s concerns it is clear that now is not necessarily the correct time to be rushing into a globalist foreign policy that failed under Obama with more military engagement than under Trump. Trump’s speak softly but carry a big stick ala Teddy Roosevelt reduced conflict in the world and disengaged US forces around the globe. Service men and women wish that such a condition would continue.
Not mentioned in his speech but a clear part of Biden’s agenda is to open the US borders so that foreigners can cross easily. Ultimately the Democrats hope to increase their voter base with this cheap labor. A whole article needs to be devoted to the immigration issue, but for our purposes here suffice it to say that US citizens will lose jobs and Charles Koch can get cheap labor. Also not mentioned but there seems to be some effort to undo some of what Trump accomplished in the middle-east. Again a subject for another article.
Weaponization in the political process
The last five years have seen a distinctive and worrisome change to our political process. There have been new and more dangerous weapons added to our political process. To those who hated Trump and anything related to Trump the ends of ousting Trump and then “killing off” his supporters make sense. Many of those who support these new weapons are new to the political dialogue and to them the ends justify the means. However, the leaders who are employing these weapons, don’t seem to care about the impact of their actions on our democracy. This is truly worrisome. Let me elaborate.
Impeachment. As we all know President Trump was impeached based on a phone call. Then the Democratic floor leaders added any other accusation into their rhetoric that they could think of to further smear this sitting president. Now, even after he is out of office the Democrats want to impeach him again in the hope that they can prevent him from running again in 2024. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, when he announced that he would not preside over such a circus, was sending a clear signal that he did not believe that such an event was constitutional. This hasn’t deterred the Democrats at all. One cannot be sure whether it is Trump Derangement Syndrome or fear of another Trump campaign that motivates the Democrats—it is probably some of both. The issue is that they have taken a constitutional procedure and weaponized it. When all else failed to prevent President Trump from fulfilling his campaign promises they went for the ultimate weapon—impeachment.
This weaponization sets a terrible precedent that could upset our political process going forward. Past Presidents must now be concerned that they can be impeached after they are out of office. Will the Republicans impeach President Obama for Russia gate? Will President Biden be impeached for his son’s financial dealings and his lies about them? We can’t answer these questions but we can see how this one precedent could upset our political process for years to come. Presidents could be afraid to do what is right for fear of a vindictive speaker of the house. The power of intimidation by impeachment threat—that is a new and dangerous weapon.
Tyranny of the majority. The second example of the tyranny of the majority is all of the discussion of removing committee assignments from a member of the House because of her recommendation that President Biden be impeached. It is a member’s party not the other party that decides a members committee assignment. What is even scarier about this is the used the process to skim off some Republicans, thus further dividing a party that really needs to learn to hang tough. However, now the Democratic majority has removed a member’s assignments by simple voting them off. Relatedly, the Senate Ethics Committee looking at Senators Cruz and Hawley for challenging the election results is another example of trying to deter future challenges of the majority’s positions by members of the minority. Again, the goal is power—the power to intimidate.
One must wonder what will happen in 2022 if the Republicans gain control of one or both houses of Congress. The Democrats know that the Republicans are not as vicious as they are so maybe they don’t have any concerns about precedents. Maybe we will get to find out.
Finally, another intimidation weapon is the denial of freedom of speech. Between the Democrats in Congress, the White House and the bureaucracies there is an active effort to deny people the freedom to speak their minds on a subject if it runs counter to what the majority wants the people to hear and maybe understand. This silencing through the power of big tech and the media is another threat to our political process. We will address it next.
Biden’s flurry of executive orders
I held back my views during the election season and the post-election squabbles, but now that the new President is acting like the dictator that he claimed President Trump was something needs to be said.
The plethora of Executive Orders are designed to do two things:
- Eliminate anything and everything that might be have been Trump related, and
- Present the image that there is a lot being done.
Let me just provide a couple of examples. One of the first Executive Orders stopped work on the Keystone Pipeline. Of course, this was advertised as helping the environment because now oil would be more expensive and the cost of gas would go up and thus people would drive less—the standard Obama justification for such actions. However, the actual effect was to put 11,000 workers out of work just at the time the economy was still trying to recover from the effects of COVID-19. The effect also was to ensure future revenue for hauling the oil by rail for Berkshire Hathaway’s railroad—Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF). Warren Buffet who founded Berkshire Hathaway has been a large donor to Democratic party causes. Hmmmm…..
Related to the pipeline order is our relationship to Saudi Arabia. The status of the Houthi rebels in Yemen was changed—they are no longer a terrorist group. And $500 million in arms sales to the Saudis is being reconsidered. Cut their arms and increase their oil revenue once the US is no longer energy independent. Is this really going to be our policy? All in the name of the environment.
The Saudi linkage goes on as the attempt to re-establish relations with Iran and the Palestinians flies directly in the face of the Trump Abraham initiative that has several Arab states recognizing and normalizing relations with Israel.
This one example shows the lack of analysis of internal linkages and relationship to other orders and the resulting causes and effects. Additionally, some of the rhetoric about what the now out of work pipeline workers can do was not very politically adept: “they can make solar panels.”
The second example is the removal of the Trump administration ban on the use of foreign aid monies to pay for abortions. Being pro abortion as a policy position is an open choice, but why at the beginning of one’s term as president does he have to anger the Catholic church and over half of the national population who are against abortion. And then the optics of sending money abroad for abortions while the Democrats can’t get a COVID relief bill through Congress are not what a good Democrat would want. But of course, it is a Trump policy to reverse and thus it had to be done immediately.
As these Executive Orders continue and the Congress wastes its time on an unconstitutional impeachment the Biden Administration is digging itself into a position that many pundits suggest will cost them both the Senate and the House in 2022. What will they do then? Will a Republican House impeach Obama, or Biden or Harris or all three? What about Jimmy Carter? Of course, I jest but the precedence is not one they should set—but of course who would think of linkages and consequences?
More to follow in coming weeks.